• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

Study Finds Women Worse Off in Post-Sadaam Iraq (1 Viewer)

Gloves

Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2008
Messages
252
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Oxfam International Releases Study Showing Decline in Women's Status

© Carey Hogg

Mar 29, 2009

Though violence has decreased throughout the war-torn country, Oxfam International finds that Iraqi women's new role as family breadwinners leads to increased hardships.

On March 8, 2009, Oxfam International released a study entitled “In Her Own Words: Iraqi Women Talk About Their Greatest Concerns and Challenges,” coinciding with International Women’s Day. The study finds that many women in Iraq have been widowed since the US-led invasion began in 2003, and subsequently have had to provide for their families without their husbands' financial support.

While no exact statistics exist, Oxfam estimates that there are currently 740,000 widows in Iraq. Many of these women have been unable to earn a decent living to support their families.

Decline of Women’s Status Since Pre-Saddam Iraq

The dire circumstances many Iraqi women now face seem particularly harsh in comparison to the relative autonomy and security women once enjoyed in pre-Saddam Iraq. According to Women for Women International, a charity that helps women survivors of war rebuild their lives, women were once encouraged to go to school and even held professional positions in government, medicine, and law.

Yet when Saddam Hussein came to power in the 1970s, women’s status began to decline, and has continued to do so throughout the US occupation of the country.

Interestingly enough, gender equality and the protection of women’s rights were cited as major reasons for the US-led invasion of Iraq. According to a December 13, 2007 article in The Guardian by Mark Lattimer, President Bush said in 2004 that "the advance of freedom in the Middle East has given new rights and new hopes to women...the systematic use of rape by Saddam's former regime to dishonour families has ended." However, as the situation in Iraq began to deteriorate after 2003's invasion, the status of women in the country became secondary to the stabilization of the country as a whole.

Today, according to Oxfam International Executive Director Jeremy Hobbs, “Women are the forgotten victims of Iraq. Despite the billions of dollars poured into rebuilding Iraq and recent security gains, a quarter of the women interviewed still do not have daily access to water, a third cannot send their children to school and since the war started, over half have been the victim of violence.”

Iraqi Government Can Improve Status of Women

The Iraqi government has the power to markedly improve the status of women throughout the country. Oxfam’s report calls upon the Iraqi government to begin a surge of investment into reviving social welfare and basic services, as women voiced having extreme difficulty in accessing adequate shelter, electricity, and clean water. Now that the fragility of the security situation has improved, albeit slightly, the government must invest a greater portion of its oil revenues into the women of Iraq, who make up the majority of the war-torn civilian population.
SOURCE: http://iraq.suite101.com/article.cfm/study_finds_women_worse_off_in_postsadaam_iraq

HA! So much for the Bush administation's noble intentions.

Do you think that Iraq is better off or worse off after the Western invasion?
 
Joined
Mar 29, 2009
Messages
327
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
It all comes down to which perspective you speak from. If from a western point of view, then by all means Iraq is better off after western intervention.
However, a true revolution only comes from within, when the people of a nation stand up to its barbarian leaders and new country is born. not this bat shit bullshit that we have going on here.
 

Gloves

Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2008
Messages
252
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
it says they have no actual statistics lol
Well, it's sort of hard to express this kind of thing using statistics. However, it does show the 750,000 women have been left without husbands who would normally provide for them.
 

withoutaface

Premium Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2004
Messages
15,098
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Well, it's sort of hard to express this kind of thing using statistics. However, it does show the 750,000 women have been left without husbands who would normally provide for them.
Doesn't help that 90% of those women were married to one of Saddam's two sons.
 

Gloves

Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2008
Messages
252
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Oxfam peddle fair trade coffee which pays its workers less than regular coffee.
Yeah well, that appears to be the only thing that really discredits the organisation. And anyway, it appears as though they had good intentions at heart.

So because of this one ordeal, anything the organisation says is incorrect from now on?
 
E

Empyrean444

Guest
SO far, due to the relative chaos and abundance of fatal occurances, I don't think we can say that Iraq, on the whole, is better off in its present situation; however, that should not vindicate the deposed regime, which, even if better, was also terrible. That said, I think (hope, at any rate) that in the long term it will benefit.
 

Barmble

Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2009
Messages
83
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Well, it's sort of hard to express this kind of thing using statistics. However, it does show the 750,000 women have been left without husbands who would normally provide for them.

That's what needs to change, it's going through a transition. Things are often worse before they're better.
 

withoutaface

Premium Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2004
Messages
15,098
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Yeah well, that appears to be the only thing that really discredits the organisation. And anyway, it appears as though they had good intentions at heart.
Most of the greatest evils of the 20th century were committed with the best of intentions.

Bush invaded Iraq with good intentions. Let not this one thing sully that.
 
E

Empyrean444

Guest
Most of the greatest evils of the 20th century were committed with the best of intentions.

Bush invaded Iraq with good intentions. Let not this one thing sully that.
Over-simplification: "ambivalent" is a better term for it. While I do not doubt that the Bush administration did have some genuine desire to depose Saddam because it was the "right thing", the WMD was utter bullshit, and he had ulterior motives which were no adjunct to what was "good".
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top