SWSydneytutor
Member
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2009
- Messages
- 45
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- HSC
- 2008
If you don't have any evidence to back up your claims, then don't speak as if they're fact. I'm perfectly fine if you state that that's your opinion, however.A vast majority of them do.
It would be arrogant to claim that medical graduates “don’t earn very much” when medical graduate salaries are clearly and significantly above the Australian average wage. There are far worse graduate salaries out there. Speaking of 'big bucks', are you saying that medical graduates only consider their salary as "big bucks" only when they're receiving the average medical specialist remuneration? Do they consider themselves earning unsatisfactorily "not very much" up to that point?
Perhaps I should have made myself clearer. Given that medical students train for more than most other students, and work in absolutely appalling conditions, then yes, I have no qualms with suggesting that $45-60K is disproportionate to their effort and perseverance. We work with a broken system, one where there are not enough resources, not enough beds and too many to care for. Many interns work many hours without pay. Many doctors do not have enough time for their own lives. I have seen many doctors work obscene hours, many without pay. If teachers are allowed to protest their meagre salaries, then so should doctors. I have talked to residents and interns at hospitals who absolutely struggle to have any time at all for their families.It’s hypocritical to speak of altruism when you were just talking about a graduate salary of $50-$65k being not very much.
altruism |ˌaltrʊɪz(ə)m|
noun
the belief in or practice of disinterested and selfless concern for the well-being of others
Quite simply, no, it was not hypocritical to discuss altruism and smaller salary packages in the same sentence. People should be allowed to care for others but at the same time, pause and say that their efforts aren't being adequately rewarded. You seem to have missed this rather simple concept. Just like any other job, a person's efforts should be rewarded. Of course there would be no doctors if there was zero pay: doctors are human beings who will have families to feed and who will need time for leisure. But no, apparently doctors should work solely for altruism. OK.
It should be. You have knowledge that they're unhappy and that no amount of money will allow them to reassess their choices.It's not a genuine consolation when they're kicking back with their 6 figure salary while they're lamenting about their career choices...
You're missing the point. I was make a generalisation akin to those made of the previous poster. Obviously not all comm/law students are out to earn six-figure sums a few years after graduation. Also, would anybody be surprised to hear about law/commerce students heading down the paths of investment banking etc. to be more blatant with their intentions? The role of the doctor and the lawyer is different. The role of the doctor in society is to care for others, so of course you'd have more cases of people having some pretty good intentions. Whether they're fake or not is not for you to judge.You’re missing the point – the com law students are at least honest about their pursuits. They’re not doing it in the guise of “altruism” while receiving a range of (at the very least) above the Australian average wage to the highly obscene 6 or 7 figure salaries.
I'm rather disillusioned with how everybody expects doctors to be simply in it for the sake altruism, helping people etc., and how they're apparently not meant ot have any consideration for financial matters at all. Doctors are human beings too and they should be afforded the right to consider how much money they'll make. This does not mean that they're in it simply for the money - it may be a factor, but not the sole one. Apparently not everybody can understand this rather simple notion.
Last edited: