Nebuchanezzar
Banned
Agreed. Unless there is a large degree of idiocy involved. For instance, building a house in a dry river bed.That's incongruous. Either all victims of natural disaster deserve a pay out, or none do.
Agreed. Unless there is a large degree of idiocy involved. For instance, building a house in a dry river bed.That's incongruous. Either all victims of natural disaster deserve a pay out, or none do.
In which case we have, in effect, everyone paying The Big Government Insurance Agency for natural disaster insurance, and I can't see how this is better than the current system whereby people are free to take out private insurance if they choose to.Agreed. Unless there is a large degree of idiocy involved. For instance, building a house in a dry river bed.
Of if effective fire management procedures had been adopted.So the only way you could really survive was if you were very lucky or if you left before you saw the front from a distance...
speak for yourself.That has nothing to do with it. You know nothing about climate science.
why not just print more money for the victimsLolling at DT poll: "Vote Now! Should your $950 go to bushfire victims instead?"
Because they'll just set it on fire again.why not just print more money for the victims
wth are you on about...? As far as I'm aware no 'environmentalist' is using this disaster for political points...Of if effective fire management procedures had been adopted.
It's very convenient for these 'environmentalists' to accord blame upon Global Warming for the horrendous conditions. However, they fail to recognise that a fire can only burn as fast as fuel is provided.
If these 'environmentalists' were genuine in their concerns, and were not attempting to utilise the disaster for political expediency, such a recognition would be made.
These policies have proven prudent. Nobody has died in fires near Port Macquarie.I don't know about Federally, but the local Greens in up in the mid-north coast (near Port Macquarie) are very against backburning and fuel-reduction burns in local national parks, such that it doesn't happen.
Victoria fires: 173 dead, towns ruined, police chase arsonists | National | News.com.auwth are you on about...? As far as I'm aware no 'environmentalist' is using this disaster for political points...
Scientists warned us this was going to happen | smh.com.auFor the first time, Mr Brumby linked the fires to global warming: "There's clear evidence now that the climate is becoming more extreme."
Fires, floods pressure Australia govt on climate | ReutersAnd here they are. The fires of Saturday were not "once in 1000 years" or even "once in 100 years" events, as our political leaders keep repeating. They were the face of climate change.
..."In a nutshell we can say the heatwaves and the fires we've seen in Victoria recently maybe partly due to climate change through the contribution of increased temperature.
"Going forward, we anticipate there will be continued increases in greenhouse gases and that locks in a certain amount of warming, and in the case of southern Australia further drying, and this will increase the fire weather risk."
eh, you throw your money into a big pot which is used for all sorts of things, some being directed towards disaster relief if necessarywaf said:In which case we have, in effect, everyone paying The Big Government Insurance Agency for natural disaster insurance, and I can't see how this is better than the current system whereby people are free to take out private insurance if they choose to.
Couldn't see it posted already, so if it has been, I do apologise:
Pastor's abortion dream inflames bushfire tragedy | smh.com.au
Do you actually believe any of the stuff you say? Do you actually act like this irl? Did you get bashed a lot in high school>?He's clearly a terrorist also. Instilling fear of God driven bushfires for the sake of his religious views!