blackops23
Member
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2010
- Messages
- 428
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2011
Ok, f(x)=[(x-1)^2]/[x+1]
g(x) = [x-1]/[(x+1)^0.5]
h(x) = +sqrt(f(x))
What is the difference between g(x) and h(x)? At first I thought g(x) = h(x), but after sketching them on a graphing software, they weren't the same, infact it looked more like h(x) = |g(x)| i.e. - (h(x) is the absolute value of h(g)...)
I was confused because I had to sketch g(x) from f(x), and I thought all you had to do was (sqrt) the y-coordinates of f(x), (therefore, g(x) will be positive for all x) but then the y-intercept of g(x) was (0,-1) -- A NEGATIVE!!
I then "graphed" h(x) on Graphmatica, and indeed it held true to it being POSITIVE for all x, so my question:
Why isn't g(x) = +sqrt(f(x)), why are there negatives on the graph of g(x)??
Thanks guys, sorry for rambling...
g(x) = [x-1]/[(x+1)^0.5]
h(x) = +sqrt(f(x))
What is the difference between g(x) and h(x)? At first I thought g(x) = h(x), but after sketching them on a graphing software, they weren't the same, infact it looked more like h(x) = |g(x)| i.e. - (h(x) is the absolute value of h(g)...)
I was confused because I had to sketch g(x) from f(x), and I thought all you had to do was (sqrt) the y-coordinates of f(x), (therefore, g(x) will be positive for all x) but then the y-intercept of g(x) was (0,-1) -- A NEGATIVE!!
I then "graphed" h(x) on Graphmatica, and indeed it held true to it being POSITIVE for all x, so my question:
Why isn't g(x) = +sqrt(f(x)), why are there negatives on the graph of g(x)??
Thanks guys, sorry for rambling...