x.Exhaust.x
Retired Member
- Discuss the limitations of the Bohr model of the hydrogen atom.
- Analyse secondary information to identify the difficulties with the Rutherford-Bohr model, including its inability to completely explain:
- The spectra of larger atoms.
- The relative intensity of spectral lines.
- The existence of hyperfine spectral lines.
- The zeeman effect.
The 2 dotpoints are essentially the same right? I don't see any differences between both dotpoints, besides the verb.
- Describe some medical and industrial applications of radio-isotopes.
- Identify data sources, and gather, process, and analyse information to describe the use of:
- A named isotope in: medicine, agriculture and engineering.
Those two dotpoints are also linked right? Is one isotope for each enough? Because I cbf learning extra for medicine and industrial itself (limited time, but mainly cbf again).
- Discuss the key features and components of the standard model of matter, including quarks and leptons.
Discuss: Identify issues and provide argument for and/or against (off the top of my head, not sure if it's the exact verb).
So what are the issues AGAINST the standard model?
- What's an atomic probe?
- For quanta, is it necessary to learn a whole nuclear reactor? E.g. how power is generated from the Lucas Heights nuclear reactor? Which dotpoint would this be?
Overall HSC:
- It's absolutely fine to use dotpoints right? Do markers actually prefer dotpoints, or a proper sentence structure? Personally if I was marking, I'd prefer dotpoints.
- Is it fine to use arrows that logically lead from one point to another? I guess it's a flow chart, but just in case markers don't rage.
Thanks in advance
Edit: Sorry about the writing before.
- Analyse secondary information to identify the difficulties with the Rutherford-Bohr model, including its inability to completely explain:
- The spectra of larger atoms.
- The relative intensity of spectral lines.
- The existence of hyperfine spectral lines.
- The zeeman effect.
The 2 dotpoints are essentially the same right? I don't see any differences between both dotpoints, besides the verb.
- Describe some medical and industrial applications of radio-isotopes.
- Identify data sources, and gather, process, and analyse information to describe the use of:
- A named isotope in: medicine, agriculture and engineering.
Those two dotpoints are also linked right? Is one isotope for each enough? Because I cbf learning extra for medicine and industrial itself (limited time, but mainly cbf again).
- Discuss the key features and components of the standard model of matter, including quarks and leptons.
Discuss: Identify issues and provide argument for and/or against (off the top of my head, not sure if it's the exact verb).
So what are the issues AGAINST the standard model?
- What's an atomic probe?
- For quanta, is it necessary to learn a whole nuclear reactor? E.g. how power is generated from the Lucas Heights nuclear reactor? Which dotpoint would this be?
Overall HSC:
- It's absolutely fine to use dotpoints right? Do markers actually prefer dotpoints, or a proper sentence structure? Personally if I was marking, I'd prefer dotpoints.
- Is it fine to use arrows that logically lead from one point to another? I guess it's a flow chart, but just in case markers don't rage.
Thanks in advance
Edit: Sorry about the writing before.
Last edited: