• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

Proof inequality (1 Viewer)

D3spair

New Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2019
Messages
14
Gender
Male
HSC
2020
Assuming x,y,z>0, how could I further prove this statement? The expansion must be used.
B44B15BE-B4DF-426D-B07A-D83662303512.jpeg
 

quickoats

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2017
Messages
970
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2019
Have you learnt about the arithmetic/geometric mean inequality yet? It usually looks something like . This can be extended to , etc.

There's a shortcut to the question using this method:


However, since the question asks you to expand, you can collect the 'like' terms of , and , and do a similar process. You should end up with .

Hopefully you find this helpful
 

D3spair

New Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2019
Messages
14
Gender
Male
HSC
2020
Have you learnt about the arithmetic/geometric mean inequality yet? It usually looks something like . This can be extended to , etc.

There's a shortcut to the question using this method:


However, since the question asks you to expand, you can collect the 'like' terms of , and , and do a similar process. You should end up with .

Hopefully you find this helpful
yup I’ve learned am-gm etc., just needed assistance on what to do after expanding. Thanks
 

CM_Tutor

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
2,642
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
You have that

We have three groups of terms, the last of which is already in the desired form, so we need to consider the other two groups.

First, the terms in the form :

Expanding gives , which is the case of the AM-GM inequality

Put and gives

Make similar substitutions with and to get , and then to get , and you have shown that:



Next, we need the case of AM-GM, :

Taking then , , and etc gives



It follows that we now have



The case of AM-GM also deals with our cubic terms:

Taking , , and gives and thus



completing the proof. Note, however, that while I have proved the case of AM-GM, I have used the case without proof, and this is not appropriate unless you are given it as a result. I recommend knowing a proof of AM-GM by heart for the cases , , and . Of these, it is the case that is difficult, IMO...
 
Last edited:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top