By definition the first parabola also has a focus/directrix as every parabola is a locus, and remember that parametrics are not a 2u topic. It would seem more correct to define the second equation as a 'special' form of the first, which passes through the origin, (0,0)y=ax^2 +bx +c (GENERAL FORM)
x intercepts at
x=(-b+-sqrt(b^2-4ac))/2
y intercept at y=c
x=4ay (PARAMETRIC FORM)
The definition of a parabola in terms of one variable p (parameter): (2ap,ap^2)
passes through origin (the only intercept)
directrix: x=-a
focus=(0,a)
TECHNICALLY x^2 = 4ay isn't the parametric form.y=ax^2 +bx +c (GENERAL FORM)
x intercepts at
x=(-b+-sqrt(b^2-4ac))/2
y intercept at y=c
x=4ay (PARAMETRIC FORM)
The definition of a parabola in terms of one variable p (parameter): (2ap,ap^2)
passes through origin (the only intercept)
directrix: x=-a
focus=(0,a)
(x-h)^2=+-4a(y-k) [General form] Where V(h,k) S(h, k+-a) is still 2u material though. But yeah i agree about it should be considered as a "special case".By definition the first parabola also has a focus/directrix as every parabola is a locus, and remember that parametrics are not a 2u topic. It would seem more correct to define the second equation as a 'special' form of the first, which passes through the origin, (0,0)