yeh i had pi/4, 3pi/4, 5pi/12 and 7pi/12Legham said:for 6 a (iv) i just had pi/12 or something. i thought we'd have to use that n.pi + or - cos.alpha crap, but i think the "first pi seconds" was there to piss that off..
yeh i had thatLegham said:4 a (i) about 0.01
yeh i had thatLegham said:(ii) about 0.285
yeh i had 0.43Legham said:(iii) 0.4ish? can't really remember
i had 250 less than you O_O i had 283 point somethingLegham said:2 d (ii) was about 533 point something.
yeh i had thatgaoOO said:i do remember that for the m values in 7, i got 0.8<m<1.2 (or something like that)
i had k = 1/(ne)gaoOO said:7a)ii, i'm fairly confident that i got wrong, so i won't post up my wrong answer.
argh, that's not what i got. I think i got pi/4, 3pi/4, 11pi/12 and something elsefishy89sg said:yeh i had pi/4, 3pi/4, 5pi/12 and 7pi/12
yeah, i got 283. something too, but i think my answer was wrong.fishy89sg said:i had 250 less than you O_O i had 283 point something
k = 1/ne is what fishy had and i had that too. but i thought i made an error on that one.sting24 said:what about 7.a)ii) i got some crazy answer with "e"s
your answers are respectable, so im assuming youre right, and thus, i am too :wave:gaoOO said:k = 1/ne is what fishy had and i had that too. but i thought i made an error on that one.
haha, i don't trust my answers on this paper. i don't think i did that well. i was a bit short on time.fishy89sg said:your answers are respectable, so im assuming youre right, and thus, i am too :wave:
Hmm.. well, gaa00 agrees with you, and someone in the general thoughts thread agreed with my answer We'll soon find out lol.fishy89sg said:i had 250 less than you O_O i had 283 point something
2dii) 284mfishy89sg said:i need to confirm the answers for the following questions (any correct answers will be greatly appreciated! )
7 (b) (iii) and (iv)
7 (a) (ii)
6 (a) (iv)
5 (b)
4 (a) (all)
2 (d) (ii)
thanks guys!!
the question was dodgey: it said that the guy was dropping, yet he was 283m (or 533m) above the point that they droppedLegham said:Hmm.. well, gaa00 agrees with you, and someone in the general thoughts thread agreed with my answer We'll soon find out lol.
No he wasn't he was below it, the distance given was that moving downwards. It was just positive in the negative direction.fishy89sg said:the question was dodgey: it said that the guy was dropping, yet he was 283m (or 533m) above the point that they dropped
Oh. Thank god i didnt act like there was something wrong.Vasc0 said:No he wasn't he was below it, the distance given was that moving downwards. It was just positive in the negative direction.
I think you had to take down as the positive direction.. Because a 10e^-0.2t was positive..fishy89sg said:the question was dodgey: it said that the guy was dropping, yet he was 283m (or 533m) above the point that they dropped
i used the definite integral approach.Legham said:Hmm.. well, gaa00 agrees with you, and someone in the general thoughts thread agreed with my answer We'll soon find out lol.
edit: actually, im pretty sure you're right. me and the other girl forgot to add a constant when integrating i think.
yeh i had 1.28metres and 0.159metres for the two distances....vladimirv said:What was the answer to the very last question, 7 b iv)
I got something very small like 0.16, and something larger.
I managed to finish the test with about 25 min remaining, and checked my whole paper except for 7 b)
So far nothing wrong i think