• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

How do you get 2Theta from z^2 ? (1 Viewer)

Joined
Aug 15, 2006
Messages
842
Location
Sydney, NSW
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
In the question,
Show that arg (1-i)z^2 = 2
- Pie/4+-2Pie

Now, (1-i) = Pie/4 is very simple, and the +-2pie thing is all straightforward, using the arg(z1.z2) = arg (z1) + arg (z2)

But how the heck do you get 2 Theta from z^2 ???


Thanks
 

Wackedupwacko

Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2005
Messages
141
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
arg( r^2cis2@) means the argument of r^2 cis2@ which is just 2@ (the angle only)

this is one of the basics of complex numbers. argument is only the angle whilst modular is the r^2 bit...
 
Joined
Aug 15, 2006
Messages
842
Location
Sydney, NSW
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Yeh, but you're not given 2@ to start off with, you're gizen z^2, which is r^2(cis@)^2, not r^2.cis2@

So I just went ahead and proved it this way:

z^2 = r^2 . (Cos @ + i.Sin @)^2
= r^2 . ( Cos^2 @ + 2.Sin@.Cos@.i + Sin^2 @.i^2 )
= r^2 . ( Cos^2 @ - Sin^2 @ + i . Sin 2@)
= r^2 . ( Cos 2@ + i . Sin 2@)

Now arg (z^2) = tan^-1 (sin 2@ / Cos 2@)
Therefor, arg (z^2) = tan^-1 (tan 2@)
= 2@


Which works, so yeh 8)
 
Last edited:

Wackedupwacko

Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2005
Messages
141
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
if u havent learnt it yet then just take our word for it.

demoives is

cis^n @ = cisn@

its proven by mathematical induction if u want the proof ill write it down later
 

Affinity

Active Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2003
Messages
2,062
Location
Oslo
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2003
expand

(cos[t] + i sin[t])(cos + i sin)

you should get

cos[t+s] + i sin[t+s]

by using suitable trig identities

then it's obvious
 
Joined
Jul 7, 2002
Messages
722
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Even more obvious if you use Euler's formula e<sup>i&theta;</sup>=cis(&theta; )

cis(t+s)=e<sup>i(t+s)</sup>=e<sup>it</sup>e<sup>is</sup>=cis(t).cis(s).

As for De Moivre's Theorem,

(cis(&theta; ))<sup>n</sup>=(e<sup>i&theta;</sup>)<sup>n</sup>=e<sup>in&theta;</sup>=cis(n&theta; ) and true for all real n, not just integers n (better than induction).
 
Last edited:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top