• Best of luck to the class of 2024 for their HSC exams. You got this!
    Let us know your thoughts on the HSC exams here
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
MedVision ad

Electromagnetism: Velocity of a subatomic particle (1 Viewer)

SB257426

Very Important User
Joined
Jul 12, 2022
Messages
309
Location
Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
Gender
Male
HSC
2023
A question popped up in a physics textbook and I would just like to clarify my answer:

Screen Shot 2023-01-24 at 7.51.17 pm.jpg

a) My answer: Potential difference is positive so ΔV = ΔU/q

and since potential difference is positive so must be ΔU.

ΔU = q*ΔV = (-1.602 * 10^-19)(100)
= -1.602 * 10^-17

ΔU = -ΔKe
-1.602 * 10^-17 = -ΔKe
1.602 * 10^-17 = ΔKe

½mv^2 (f) - ½mv^2 (i) = 1.602 * 10^-17
½mv^2 (f) = 1.602 * 10^-17

then re-arranging for v and solving the values I got:

v = 1..86 * 10^7 m/s

b)
ΔU = q*ΔV = (-1.602 * 10^-19)(100)
= 1.602 * 10^-17
ΔU = -ΔKe
-1.602 * 10^-17 = -ΔKe
-1.602 * 10^-17 = ΔKe
½mv^2 (f) - ½mv^2 (i) = 1.602 * 10^-17
½mv^2 (f) = -1.602 * 10^-17


But if u rearrange for v then the expression inside the square root is negative ???????

c) I don't even know where to start, an alpha particle is 2 protons and 2 electrons???


Any help would be appreciated !!!
 

wizzkids

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2016
Messages
330
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
1998
The equations you used are the correct equations, but, you need to recognise the question refers to speed, and not velocity.
Speed is always a positive number. Speed doesn't have a direction, it is not a signed quantity.
Kinetic energy is also a scalar quantity, so it doesn't have a direction.
OK, so now we are going to need the masses of these particles to substitute into the kinetic energy equation. You got the electron and the proton masses correct, The alpha particle is a positively charged helium nucleus, consisting of two protons and two neutrons.
I think you can finish the question now with these hints.
One last thing you need to consider.
If this was a real question in the HSC, you need to test whether any of the particles are reaching relativistic velocity. That means, does the speed exceed about 10% of the speed of light, which is 3 x 108 m/s (c). The particle we need to examine more closely is the electron, because it has such a small mass.
The speed you got for the electron is 1.86 x 107 m/s which is less than 10% of c, so you don't need to use the more complicated relativistic equation for mass and energy.
 

SB257426

Very Important User
Joined
Jul 12, 2022
Messages
309
Location
Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
Gender
Male
HSC
2023
The equations you used are the correct equations, but, you need to recognise the question refers to speed, and not velocity.
Speed is always a positive number. Speed doesn't have a direction, it is not a signed quantity.
Kinetic energy is also a scalar quantity, so it doesn't have a direction.
OK, so now we are going to need the masses of these particles to substitute into the kinetic energy equation. You got the electron and the proton masses correct, The alpha particle is a positively charged helium nucleus, consisting of two protons and two neutrons.
I think you can finish the question now with these hints.
One last thing you need to consider.
If this was a real question in the HSC, you need to test whether any of the particles are reaching relativistic velocity. That means, does the speed exceed about 10% of the speed of light, which is 3 x 108 m/s (c). The particle we need to examine more closely is the electron, because it has such a small mass.
The speed you got for the electron is 1.86 x 107 m/s which is less than 10% of c, so you don't need to use the more complicated relativistic equation for mass and energy.
Thanks so much for your reply !!

Indeed, the textbook question does mention something about relativistic velocity several times through these types of questions, under some of the examples it even said that the speed was unrealistic so we would need to make a reference to the relativisitic velocity instead
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top