drewgcn
postpantsism
We've been given two textbooks from our school, was making some notes and just realised an anomaly with the two.
The first - Leading Edge "Australia in the Global Economy" describes economic growth as a measure of change in real GNP per capita and economic development as the HDI.
The second - J. Bulmer's "Updated Economics" describes economic growth as a measure of real GDP (raw - not per capita)and economic development as real GDP per capita.
Personally I would have thought them both half-correct, that economic growth would be based on real GDPs, and economic development as based on the HDI, but I'm not entirely sure now, seeing as neither textbook even mentions the other measure.
The first - Leading Edge "Australia in the Global Economy" describes economic growth as a measure of change in real GNP per capita and economic development as the HDI.
The second - J. Bulmer's "Updated Economics" describes economic growth as a measure of real GDP (raw - not per capita)and economic development as real GDP per capita.
Personally I would have thought them both half-correct, that economic growth would be based on real GDPs, and economic development as based on the HDI, but I'm not entirely sure now, seeing as neither textbook even mentions the other measure.