If I was to do a 5 year double degree of Bachelor of Science (physics)/Bachelor of Engineering (civil), would thsi make me more employable, or less employable having completed less elective etc in each course when compared to others? Discuss please.
From a classmate, R:fOR3V3RPINKKKK said:I don't think it makes you more or less employable in a particular industry.
its 5 years for eng/sci and 5.5 years for eng/com. it wouldnt really matter because you would still have to do all the core engineering major subjects and you wouldn't have to do gen ed. think carefully about your science major because you only get 10 science electives in the eng/sci program and most science majors (i think chem and phys are the only exceptions) require you to do more then 10 science electives.wrong_turn said:at unsw its 5.5 years i think
and i dont think it really matters that much. it really depends i guess what you do in each of those degrees
stuff gen eds.Morbo said:its 5 years for eng/sci and 5.5 years for eng/com. it wouldnt really matter because you would still have to do all the core engineering major subjects and you wouldn't have to do gen ed. think carefully about your science major because you only get 10 science electives in the eng/sci program and most science majors (i think chem and phys are the only exceptions) require you to do more then 10 science electives.
i disagree.Forbidden. said:From a classmate, R:
"I decided to do Commerce but then if I do Engineering and Commerce together I think they will consider you more over other Commerce students."
I think you're wrong there. I've been talking to a few students who do the combined degree and Engineering/commerce students are often hired (over straight commerce students) due to their analytic/mathematical ability.fOR3V3RPINKKKK said:Yes! Of Course! Because commerce firms will really care that you have knowledge in something that is completely unrelated to your job.
So? Speaking english fluently will put you ahead of at least 50% of commerce students out there. Not doubting that the engi/comm had superior math ability, but I doubt that was the deciding factor.erm said:I think you're wrong there. I've been talking to a few students who do the combined degree and Engineering/commerce students are often hired (over straight commerce students) due to their analytic/mathematical ability.
Well i'm sure speaking fluently (which most of us should be able to do anyway) and having such a double degree would make you more attractive.Sammy-Blue said:So? Speaking english fluently will put you ahead of at least 50% of commerce students out there. Not doubting that the engi/comm had superior math ability, but I doubt that was the deciding factor.
In what industry?erm said:I think you're wrong there. I've been talking to a few students who do the combined degree and Engineering/commerce students are often hired (over straight commerce students) due to their analytic/mathematical ability.
I would disagree, why is Engineering completely unrelated to a business/service firm? The Big 4 actually hire people from across a variety of disciplines, in fact a number of the graduates I met at PwC a few days ago had no business experience but where into IT/Engineering.fOR3V3RPINKKKK said:Yes! Of Course! Because commerce firms will really care that you have knowledge in something that is completely unrelated to your job.
I finally get to bitch to my carpentry/commerce/architecture/science/medical science friends about how crazy an engineering degree is.billbro said:I would disagree, why is Engineering completely unrelated to a business/service firm? The Big 4 actually hire people from across a variety of disciplines, in fact a number of the graduates I met at PwC a few days ago had no business experience but where into IT/Engineering.
I don't see how having an Engineering degree would not give you an advantage, it is well known that such a degree is substantially harder than a Commerce Degree. Obviously, having something on top of the Commerce Degree that everyone else has is bound to offer at least a marginal benefit.
The trade off that should be considered, is whether that extra 2.5 years is worth the opportunity cost in work experience. No doubt it will be beneficial, but is forgoing 2.5 years of pay and work experience going to get you further later on? I would think it probably wouldn't get you further along in the long run, unless you were doing like Com/Law - simply a slight advantage initially.