Students helping students, join us in improving Bored of Studies by donating and supporting future students!
yes the -b/2a is very helpfuli did the same as you except i used the discriminant being -ive in x^2+2x+3 and then tested x=0 to find that x^2+2x+3 is +ive for all x values ie the domain is all real x
additionally, you can use the parabola's axis of symmetry, -b/2a, instead of using the derivative to find the max y value. taking the inverse will make the lowest y value the highest so the range will be from 0 non inclusive to 1/sqrt2 inclusive (i think that is ext1 graphing and idk if this is an adv question? all the maths gets confused in my head lol)
well it was originally a parabola (in fact you even noted this in your working with your u sub) and now it's been transformed a couple times. the sqrt doesnt change anything about WHERE the lowest/highest y value is, just WHAT it is, and the inverse or whatever it is makes the lowest value become the highest and vice versa, leading to y approaching 0 at both x= +ive and -ive infinityyes the -b/2a is very helpful
instead of all the messy derivative stuff
i didn't think of it cus it doesn't look like a parabola to me
1/f(x)also what do you mean inverse?
why tf you doing the stupid ass test method? Just sketch a parabola using the zeros after factorisinghere's my working out (took me forever to write it sooo neatly)
View attachment 47399
good luck factorising (x^2 + 2x + 3)why tf you doing the stupid ass test method? Just sketch a parabola using the zeros after factorising
I tried completing the square, that didn't help at all T-Tgood luck factorising (x^2 + 2x + 3)
funny answers