That should be the case. Rubric terms essentially form part of a student's understanding of a particular module, which is further demonstrated by their knowledge and understanding of their prescribed texts as well as their ability to provide an extensive analysis that indicates the connection that their prescribed texts have with the module in question (which is typically done through the use of relevant techniques and quotes). Consider Module A, which includes key terms/concepts such as resonances and dissonances and the following examples from different essays:
"... the parallels also uncover significant resonances about ourselves."
"... forming intertextual connections and elucidating universal concepts through the dissonances between the texts."
"Pacino’s film dissonantly collides with its hypotext by reinforcing the secular viewpoint of ambition and portraying the individualistic notion that anybody has free will to fulfill their ambitions."
Of course, as MJRey mentioned, the main goal is to provide a suitable response to a specific question, meaning that the key terms of the question should be prioritised.
I hope this helps!