imogenhubber
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2013
- Messages
- 3
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2014
I'm using Raschella's Leaky Boat doco for my related. The core text is Julius Caesar, and I'm having real trouble sustaining an argument between them not just because of the vastly different subject matter but mostly because the documentary is so much less complex a text.
Essentially the only conflict presented in the doco is between the Howard government's anti asylum seeker rhetoric and the composer's humanitarian viewpoint (and the factions of the public that support those views respectively), whereas Shakespeare's characters have a multitude of conflicts between characters, within characters, between composer and character, contextually, etc. etc.
It's hard to even write a conclusion, since for Shakespeare the audience leaves with highly varied conclusions despite the composer voicing his own at the end ("and he was the noblest Roman of all") because of the nuanced characterisation, but Raschella's audience comes away wholeheartedly agreeing with the composer.
Any suggestions much appreciated.
Essentially the only conflict presented in the doco is between the Howard government's anti asylum seeker rhetoric and the composer's humanitarian viewpoint (and the factions of the public that support those views respectively), whereas Shakespeare's characters have a multitude of conflicts between characters, within characters, between composer and character, contextually, etc. etc.
It's hard to even write a conclusion, since for Shakespeare the audience leaves with highly varied conclusions despite the composer voicing his own at the end ("and he was the noblest Roman of all") because of the nuanced characterisation, but Raschella's audience comes away wholeheartedly agreeing with the composer.
Any suggestions much appreciated.