Kevin Rudd
Premium Member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2006
- Messages
- 9
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- N/A
Councils pay for brothel sex (Sunday Telegraph, 21/01/07)
So is this a legitimate use of resident's rates to ensure a conviction? Or is it staggering misappropriation of council funds?
Should as the State Opposition says, the focus be on shifting the onus of proof back onto brothel operators, thereby making such actions by council unnecessary?
Sex spy Private Eye's reportSYDNEY councils are paying private detectives thousands of dollars to have sex with prostitutes so they can gather sufficient proof against illegal brothels.
Nine councils across Sydney have forked out $25,000 in fees to private investigators over the past three years.
The Sunday Telegraph has learned that Ku-ring-gai Council spent $7000 in the past month employing detectives to have sex with prostitutes.
Ku-ring-gai mayor Nick Ebbeck said the extreme measures were necessary to prove the businesses were illegal. [...]
So is this a legitimate use of resident's rates to ensure a conviction? Or is it staggering misappropriation of council funds?
Should as the State Opposition says, the focus be on shifting the onus of proof back onto brothel operators, thereby making such actions by council unnecessary?
Last edited: