MedVision ad

Complex Number Confusion (1 Viewer)

X-burner

New Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2011
Messages
1
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
I don't get how arg(z^n) = n arg (z), do u just remember it, can someone prove by induction or just explain what happened there. Thanks
 

bleakarcher

Active Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2011
Messages
1,509
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Define the proposition P(n): arg(z^n)=n*arg(z), n integral
When n=1, LHS=arg(z)=RHS
Hence, P(1) is true
Assuming P(k) is true,
ie P(k):arg(z^k)=k*arg(z), k integral
Try to prove for P(k+1):
P(k+1):arg(z^[k+1])=(k+1)arg(z)
Now, LHS=arg((z^k)*z)=arg(z^k)+arg(z)=k*arg(z)+arg(z)=(k+1)arg(z)=RHS
Hence, if P(k) holds P(k+1) holds also
Since P(1) is true, P(2) must be true and so on for all integers n>0
 
Last edited:

bleakarcher

Active Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2011
Messages
1,509
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
btw dude if u dont understand my prove for LHS=RHS, here r the laws i assumed u already knew:
z^(k+1)=(z^k)*(z^1) as (x^m)*(x^n)=x^(m+n)
also:
arg[z1*z2]=arg(z1)+arg(z2)
 

SpiralFlex

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2010
Messages
6,960
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
Another explanation (To help you understand what is going on.)

Let us consider,













What if we were to multiply these two together?







We get a semi-messy expansion, so if I arrange it to a familiar form of,







What happened to the arguments now?



We can see that the arguments have added!



That explanation was for the general case, so if-






(Arguments added as we have shown before.)







Have a look at this trend, once again,
















And if we to do this so on, the general case is,

 
Last edited:

math man

Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2009
Messages
503
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
or by de moivre's theorem:

let

taking both sides to the power of n:



now



hence we get:



Therefore:
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top