Ok, I've been reading around and I've found different places saying different postulates were used to explain the observed hydrogen emission spectra.
The one that makes sense to me is his second postulate, where an electron has to absorb/emit a photon to change between stationary states. So when an electron moves to lower states it emits photon of energy with specific wavelengths.... the wavelengths observed on hydrogen emission spectra.
But then other places I've read that his third postulate of quantised angular momentum was used to explain the distinct spectral lines.
I'm a bit confused here, whether which one was used to explain hydrogen spectra, or was it the combination of both??
Could you help me out here??
Thanks!!
The one that makes sense to me is his second postulate, where an electron has to absorb/emit a photon to change between stationary states. So when an electron moves to lower states it emits photon of energy with specific wavelengths.... the wavelengths observed on hydrogen emission spectra.
But then other places I've read that his third postulate of quantised angular momentum was used to explain the distinct spectral lines.
I'm a bit confused here, whether which one was used to explain hydrogen spectra, or was it the combination of both??
Could you help me out here??
Thanks!!