damm, i put C(R), cos at q u are only just being affected by change in concavityy. Its a stupid question anyway, cos wuld it make a difference if the stupid car was tyravelling at constant speed? because then R would have a better chance.
The reason i put R was because i went skiing for the first time in July holidays, and i was at the bottom of a double black diamond run at Mt Hotham (Mary's slide if anyones been there and know wot im talking about), and at the end it dips down, and onto a bridge(over a creek) and back up again, just like the diagram. Well i made the Q part of this quite easily, but when i came up the dip near R and S, the g-forces pulling me down were absolutely massive!!! my knees just gave way causing my to fall backwards in my boots, still attached the the skiis. trying to stop it kinda lent sideways and my skiis pulled me around to the right, and i started sliding back down the bank, only to the side of the bridge, to the CREEK!. as i was desperately trying to dig my hands into the snow to slow down i was looking as a snowboarder already in the creek trying to get out his board. you should have seen his face when he saw me comming. With one last desperate stab at the snow i was able to stop, only half a foot from a drop into the creek. There went all my pride.
Anyway my point is, i had a PRACTICAL kind of experimental experiance of this question, and i probably got it wrong. maybe i should have gone to Australias wonderland instead!!!! did anyone go there and answer their question according to their experiance?
Damn pyhsics, it just doen't make sense!!