MedVision ad

Accidently rinse pipette or burette (1 Viewer)

fatassmcfat

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2012
Messages
118
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2014
OK this is confusing me
Say in your burette you have your KNOWN solution and you accidently rinse with water. What effect does it have on calculated concentration of your UNKNOWN?
And same for other way around- if unknown was in burette?
 

aimpacc

Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
77
Location
trolololololol
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2013
rinse water means u dilute ur sht. so the volume needed by unknown to reach the whatever point (i forgot) is less.
now c=n/v. if v decrease, so the perceived c increase.

burettes are fat, so its easier to continually run liquids from top to bottom, u essentially can just wash out ur water with the whatever solution. u shouldnt have a problem with burette....unless u dont know wat ur doing....

goodluck.. :)
 

golgo13

Alchemist
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
304
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
Generally tho it shouldn't matter as much, but if you do it means u need more solution in the burette to dilute for the unknown meaning, he concentration of unknown would be more
 

Kurosaki

True Fail Kid
Joined
Jul 14, 2012
Messages
1,167
Location
Tubbytronic Superdome
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
If you accidently rinse with water, then the solution will become diluted when you add it in.
Therefore, you will require a greater volume of solution to reach equivalence point.
However, we don't know this, so we assume it is still the initial concentration, which is HIGHER than the actual concentration.
Therefore, we overestimate the moles used, using n=cv.
More moles- greater concentration obtained.
I hope that that helps! :)
 

hit patel

New Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2012
Messages
568
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Uni Grad
2018
If you accidently rinse with water, then the solution will become diluted when you add it in.
Therefore, you will require a greater volume of solution to reach equivalence point.
However, we don't know this, so we assume it is still the initial concentration, which is HIGHER than the actual concentration.
Therefore, we overestimate the moles used, using n=cv.
More moles- greater concentration obtained.
I hope that that helps! :)
+1
 

golgo13

Alchemist
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
304
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
Maybe i haven't done it in a while but last i checked you rinse down your concical flask with purified water progressively during the prac?
 

2xL

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2010
Messages
582
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
Yeah but OP is talking about diluting the solution of known concentration (standard) in the burette. Not the conical flask.
 

golgo13

Alchemist
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
304
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
But you can apply the same principle, you're rinsing the burette you aren't exactly leaving huge amounts of water, yes your result will change but the change is small is what i'm saying, which alters your results slightly not a huge amount.
 

Kurosaki

True Fail Kid
Joined
Jul 14, 2012
Messages
1,167
Location
Tubbytronic Superdome
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
But you can apply the same principle, you're rinsing the burette you aren't exactly leaving huge amounts of water, yes your result will change but the change is small is what i'm saying, which alters your results slightly not a huge amount.
In titration we require an extremely high degree of accuracy so it does matter a lot...?
 

2xL

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2010
Messages
582
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
In titration we require an extremely high degree of accuracy so it does matter a lot...?
Yes. I'd say it would matter significantly even if we had a few drops. Saying that "it wouldn't change much" is very poor justification imo.
 

golgo13

Alchemist
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
304
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
Ok, then i think it's fair to say if you guys want it acurate, then you should be rising with your use of solution, and drying with alcohol, because then the argument goes, if it was rinsed it may contain contamanent left in the droplets left within the burette even though it should be ok but your results wouldn't be accurate.
Principally i agree yes it requires a high degree of accuracy, but put into perspective and be practical for someone doing this in High School chem...
 

someth1ng

Retired Nov '14
Joined
Sep 18, 2010
Messages
5,558
Location
Adelaide, Australia
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
Uni Grad
2021
Maybe i haven't done it in a while but last i checked you rinse down your concical flask with purified water progressively during the prac?
No, don't do that. This would result in diluting too much - effectively resulting in pushing the pH closer to 7. If anything, you want the least amount of water possible to prevent this from happening.
 

someth1ng

Retired Nov '14
Joined
Sep 18, 2010
Messages
5,558
Location
Adelaide, Australia
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
Uni Grad
2021
Ok, then i think it's fair to say if you guys want it acurate, then you should be rising with your use of solution, and drying with alcohol, because then the argument goes, if it was rinsed it may contain contamanent left in the droplets left within the burette even though it should be ok but your results wouldn't be accurate.
Principally i agree yes it requires a high degree of accuracy, but put into perspective and be practical for someone doing this in High School chem...
This is very poor advice, it's not even funny.

There are a couple of times you should/need to wash with alcohol or ether or acetone. You do it when you want DRY glassware or when you need to get rid of organic residue. Ideally, what you really want to do is wash with water, then acetone, then water (deionised), then the solution it will hold but acetone is usually not needed because burettes should rarely have organics in them anyway. In any case, the results should be accurate just by washing with water and the solution it will hold. What's wrong with your argument is that there shouldn't be any significant amount of contaminants in the water you washed with if you used deionised anyway, and especially so if you washed properly. So no, your argument is not valid and even for a high school experiment, to propagate an idea that it's okay to be inaccurate in analytical chemistry is ridiculous.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top