Originally posted by santaslayer
7) If you check the definition and nature of "Law" in most textbooks, it usually highlights the important factor of it being enforecable.
Originally posted by Asquithian
question 7 is B ...for what i remember from legal ...your subject to law because its enforceable simple.
Alright, fair enough. I wasn't sure; hence the question mark.
(It does seem to be poorly worded though... why are people subject to the law? Because it's enforceable... why is the law enforceable? Because people submit to it...)
Originally posted by santaslayer
10)= I thought the answer would of been "B". Isn't our legal system suppose to promote accessibility? (In theory)
Generally, I'd agree with you; at first glance, the answer seems counter-intuitive.
However, if I recall correctly, the "rule of standing" operates to prevent parties from appealing when they have no valid or worthwhile grounds for the appeal. The best answer seemed to be 'A'.
Am afraid I disagree with your Q3, Asq.
I don't think the terms "natural justice" and "the Commonwealth Constitution" are interchangeable. (Your answer also appears to be inconsistent with your answer to Q6.)