Search results

Then why is the marking centre warning against it? Why has the President of the English Teachers Assosiation prepared a paper on the way to approach Module B study for teachers and students because it's answered poorly by so many candidates year after year? Why does he say "The syllabus...

Just to back up what I'm saying, here's the syllabus: Nothing about readings in there.... "Other's perspectives" simply refers to critics and reviews. Not a Marxist or feminist reading. Here's an extract from last year's notes from the marking centre: Basically, this all says: Don't use...

To answer the question, you had to specify your understanding of the text in relation to whatever it was on about. You didn't have to use any personal pronouns. You can show your personal interpretation through other means, it's about how you write in an evaluate manner, using evaluate words. So...

I would postulate that those who answered against Quick being significant would immediately have a more sophistocated argument, and if you kept mentioning that your points were more important than Quick for x, y and z reasons, then you're showing deeper understanding and evaluation. It was a...

The only 'reading' you were required to apply in this module was your own. Read the freaking notes from the marking centre for this module from the past couple of years. It's not difficult stuff, it says plainly that you don't have to, because it's not the point of this module. Don't trust me...

Far out, Paul and Goodomi, if you really care so much, take it somewhere else. Meet for dinner or something. It's not necessary, I'm sure you're each as good as one another, and as talented as anyone who is able to do music 2, but there's no need to have an argument about whether jazz or...