MedVision ad

Search results

  1. I

    is law ok??

    yep I am
  2. I

    Co-op

    I used to do BIT. If you're made it through to the interview stage, good stuff - obviously your application has been good enough. The purpose of the interview is basically to put a human face onto the paper application you mailed in. They just want to know if you're (1) who you said you were on...
  3. I

    is law ok??

    1. What qualities do u need to do well (or cope with) in LAW. The popular belief is that uni courses are divided into Science or Humanities ("numbers" and "words"). I would say law is both. You don't need to be good in English, as in the high school type of English, to do it. As long as you...
  4. I

    To people in LAWS1061 (torts!)

    Torts AND *Contracts*? Are you a grad student or something? The case seems weighted heavily in favour of the respondents, so looks like you have less legwork to do anyway haha
  5. I

    To people in LAWS1061 (torts!)

    Yep that's me. I can't believe we signed up for a Torts moot straight after handing in a Torts essay. Gluttons for punishment... Have you done much for it? I'm finding it hard to get motivated given the holidays have already started (more or less).
  7. I

    To people in LAWS1061 (torts!)

    Ok, the essay has been handed in and all, so I'm just discussing this for "fun" now :) (Coincidentally, I do believe I am mooting you on Monday!) It is true in terms that the perception of "sudden sensory shock" (direct perception) is a requirement (as you noted in the CLA and Tame &...
  8. I

    To people in LAWS1061 (torts!)

    A non-delegable duty was owed by DNPW to Hui and Mark (but not John). No duty was owed to DSR. There is a special relationship between DNPW and cyclists within the park. It doesn't fit into a category already established in law (like an independant contractor/employer; hospital/patient...
  9. I

    To people in LAWS1061 (torts!)

    Yeah don't worry about it, it's just a minor point
  10. I

    To people in LAWS1061 (torts!)

    dude, check out Section 17 of the Property act
  11. I

    To people in LAWS1061 (torts!)

    Heh, s 30(5) refers to the Property (Relationships) Act, which says 2 years... but you didn't need to look up that act because you should have been told about the 2 years thing in class.
  13. I

    To people in LAWS1061 (torts!)

    Ok you run through the statutory authority tests for DSR, and assume they owe a general duty of care, right? Then you have to examine each plaintiff for qualification under the nervous shock tests. Mark is barred because he's not a relative, a rescuer or in fear for his own life, and thus...
  14. I

    To people in LAWS1061 (torts!)

    which bit?
  15. I

    To people in LAWS1061 (torts!)

    tanman: Key tip for law - it really doesn't matter what your conclusion is, especially if everyone is getting different ones. The MAIN aim is to make sure your answers are justifiable. The contentious issues are normally over questions of fact anyway. I concluded that only Hui was owed a duty...
Top