Search results

How did you interpret the question? More specifically, how did you interpret "originality"? I didn't really have much to say about originality itself so instead I talked about "original ways of thinking" and how pomo subverts them.. Probably not so clever in hindsight.

Yeah I prefer the first way although I'm worried it might become distracting for the marker if I swing back and forth between texts so often.. I don't want to detract meaning from the texts just because of some silly structural error.

So I understand that integrating your texts so that your response is structured around ideas and not texts shows a more sophisticated style of writing... But how exactly would one go about it? I'm attempting to re-work my journeys essay (a bit late, I'm aware) and I'm struggling with the...