Nope 100% how I feel, I knew I was going to get full marks because my mum told me, but then in maths nesa asked about stuff I hadn't studied for because they hate me soooooo much. (Yes this is satirical)
Personally, I would have got 100% guaranteed in every subject but then nesa put in hard questions and I failed everything and it's all their fault so I now have no other option than to abuse them and get my marks back in a massive email. Thank you so much for providing their email, I will now...
It really depends on what type of person you how hard you're willing to work, I think there are some good YT videos on it. Personally, I would just stay up late until I got what I wanted done, but everyone's different. Like are you struggling to find time because of co curricular's, or do you...
There are 24 hours in a day, if you try hard enough you can almost always find the time. For me, it was more about finding the motivation to find the time
@O01x is wrong, the question is not about finding the domain of an inverse function, it is about finding which of the domains allow it to be an inverse function. You need to think about the horizontal line test where the line cannot pass through more than one point in order for it to be...
Personally, I regret not dropping VA but it looks like your situation is very different to mine. Report marks are unscaled (at my school at least) so I do believe getting an 82 in maths is actually considerably better than an 89 in VA atar wise. However, I still think VA has many things going...
I tried it and couldn't do it either, thought I was ok at induction but apparently not. My working is below if someone is willing to tell me where I went wrong. Also sorry but idk how to use latex
Show true when n=1
= 3^(2x2) - 1
= 3^4 - 1
=80
=8x10 therefore true for n=1
Assume n=k
3^(2k)^2...
Has anyone ever even lost marks for not rounding enough? (Unless it is meant to be an exact value).
i.e answering 2.35634 instead of 2.4.
I normally write out the non-rounded version before the rounded answer to be safe so the marker knows where I rounded from.
So some website says this (NFA refer to the value of overseas assets owned by a nation, minus the value of its domestic assets that are owned by foreigners). I thought equity and assets meant the same thing?
So Net foreign liabilities + Net foreign debt + Net Foreign Equity
I'm getting a bit confused as to what the negative/positive balance would mean in Net Debt and Equity.
E.g if NFE = +20 and NFD = +20 would NFL = +40
I'm confused because wouldn't positive equity reduce NFL?
Because the subsidy is being applied to all 400 units, not just the additional ones. E.g if Australian banana farmers supply 300 bananas and they are given a subsidy allowing the price of Australian banana drops from $14 to $10 (expensive banana's ik). They now are more competitive and can sell...
Ok, I might be asking for too much here but does anyone have or know of a resource that has all the major stats needed and organized to suit hsc? Thank you so much!