Search results

Question though. If majority of the cohort does poorly, that means that lower marks should correlate to a higher rank/ATAR correct?

Yeah, I'm really hoping that ATAR's will be boosted because of it. Really need that mark... But I agree, everyone I have talked to or seen has said that their marks were low, even from selectives... Fingers crossed...

Sounds like a lot of people are getting marks lower than expected. Hopefully that bodes well for ATAR's On another note, f***ing 88's and 89's... :(

Yeah not gonna lie, hoping everyone else's marks were lower too, because otherwise I'm so screwed... Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Good luck this morning everyone! Hope everyone gets the marks they desire :) Not long now :/ Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Yeah thought so, should be sweet. Thanks Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Raw mark needed for 93 approximately? Cheers

Basically whenever they give you enough information to calculate the moles of two or more different substances in the equation. (Don't forget that products can be limiting reagents also) Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Probably some sort of back titration type question I think (or like a weird ppm or sulfate content one) Hope they dont assess the dumb memory stuff. The conceptual questions are more fun Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Yeah apparently answer was ~424ms^-1 Whilst most apparently did it by equating E, I did it by calculating the g on moon (from given data), and then subbed it and delta y=500km into the projectile motion questions. I got the same answer, but will I lose a mark based on my incorrect assumption...

So depressing honestly. Combination of exam stress and getting the two things I was worst at (probability and binomial series) in the one go I guess. But yeah realistically looking at 57 raw too I think... Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Yeah thought so :/ Was averaging 90 raw for every practice exam since 2008, and then managed to stuff the one that mattered. Rip. Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

I'm looking at anywhere between 55-60... Roughly what would these equate to? Thanks :)

Welp, I screwed it :( Anyone know what a mark of 54, 57 and 60 would align to roughly? Dreams of 95 aligned ruined...?

We have personally been told that the methods of that course are of course favored, and majority of the time easier also. However, we have been taught that any knowledge from 4U can be applied in 3U, etc. Interested to see if this is true? Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Oh awesome, where abouts are you looking at heading to? Hope you make the cutoff for it :) And yeah, amen to 4U. Hope to scrape through into E4 depending on the cutoff, I'll be happy with that considering this is the first year its run at my school... Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Yeah thought so haha. I honestly only really need 95, for Advanced Science at ANU, but my personal goal is 97-98 for myself more than anything. I would love to do the PhB at ANU, but I just dont think 99 is realistic for me, unless everything goes perfectly haha. How about yourself? Sent...

Oh cool! Do you mean in terms of reported marks for each subject or course I want to do? Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Yeah I tend to agree. I think it was more difficult imo than most of the 4U exams since the format change, however still not necessarily as difficult as they were pre-2012, so we shall see I guess. Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

How would you compare the difficulty to this years paper? Hoping the cutoff is similar to 2013... Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk