Search results

99.85 :d :d

No idea, but LOW. That was a hard exam and they know it, with a significantly lower average raw mark I'd imagine, and the aligning process should adjust accordingly.

I said lobby to repeal, but I think the question was far too vague, and that may very well be wrong. My reasoning though is on the previous page.

With respect to the charge negotiation question, the reason I believe, wholeheartedly, that the judge "considering" the agreement is the correct answer is because of the outcome of the 2002 Dib Case. In this case the presiding judge, Justice Hulme, rejected a charge negotiation on the basis that...

I understand that logic, though I think the question was too ambiguous. My rationale for answering "repeal the law" was that, as per the scenario, Kevin had been convicted but not yet sentenced. Whilst it is true that the law probably wouldn't be able to apply retrospectively, if, under this...