Search results

depends on course and uni my law units - only a few people get HDs each semester, I have no HDs my non-law units - super fucking easy to get HDs, I have all HDs also depends on whether you're full time or part time and whether you work. No.

nvm

thats such bullshit. i hope you get an offer in february. im trying again next year, going to repeat a few units where i got low grades.

My 100% accurate prediction = everyone in this thread gets an offer but me.

I looked into studying in a shitty country. High end degrees were still very competitive, though it would depend on what you want to do... From what I saw it's better to stay in Australia (higher pay, easier entry, better living conditions etc) but you should research it yourself.

Yes.

I'm not sure that you need a laptop for uni. While many people do use laptops, I just write down notes in my notebook and I think that helps improve my writing for the final exams. If I were you I would wait a few weeks into your degree to see if you actually need a laptop before spending the money.

dunno at uws orientation they said they wont be bringing up the fees at uws tho. so maybe it depends on uni. it also depends on how much u'd earn without a degree.... presumably u'd make a lot less only having a high school certificate rather than a 5 year degree. plus, the website showed a...

B Feminist Dance Studies @ ACU

if u dont get in we're all doomed from what i read on the unsw website they always look at atar+uni marks (50/50). is this true? thats the reason i havent applied to unsw i have a 79 wam but my gpa is 5.9. i think for external transfers they only look at gpa and not the wam. so im pretty sure...

/r/iamverysmart its sad because 2 years ago i might have had the same attitude.

i'm doing law at uws but i want to transfer to usyd. my atar was <90 and my wam is 79. is there any possibility of me successfully transferring? is it true they look at gpa?

To be fair I was able to find a judgment from Victoria where they used the terminology of 'self-defence' without what was said in Cornelissen.

There are three types of homicide which are murder, voluntary manslaughter and involuntary manslaughter. I want to clarify what these are. Then I will try to explain why self-defence can't really be used for involuntary manslaughter. The actus reus elements for all homicides are contained in...

I'll reply in a few hours, I need to finish an assignment. It's due at 10.

If a person was charged with manslaughter on those facts, I think it would have to be a manslaughter by an unlawful and dangerous act. I think this would require proving that there was an assault, and that this assault was dangerous. Self-defence could act as a defence to the assault. But the...

Mens rea for murder (s18 Crimes Act 1900 NSW) = intent to kill, intent to inflict grievous bodily harm ("really serious injury" - DPP v Smith), recklessness (foresight of probability of death - Crabbe; Royall), or constructive murder (murder committed during 25+ yr crime). So that's murder -...

Hang on. Isn't manslaughter = unlawful and dangerous and/or criminal negligence? How would you argue self-defence? Idk, I could be wrong. I need to look at manslaughter again. Right. Voluntary manslaughter = reduced to manslaughter from murder by a partial defence (extreme provocation...

:| post the exam paper and i might be able to tell you.

Actually strict liability means honest and reasonable mistake of fact (He Kaw Teh). What you're talking about is absolute liability. But I don't think that's in the legal studies syllabus. Can someone post the paper? I'm curious about how I would go now that I'm actually in law school.