Search results

It wasn't intended to be witty, but it was intended to be picked up by someone with half a brain.

funny how you failed to recognise my pun regarding greens and vegetables, moron

i like my meat

By getting into the pants of a girl i otherwise might not sleep with, i'd be able to sleep with her mum. Supposing the mum's looks are sufficient, is it morally right to go through with this transaction?

me 3!!!

i hope those sunbathers get cancer and die a slow death. scum.

yeh, so...?

Re: Australian Politics Chatter Thread i didn't say they were evidence. i said that they SUPPORTED my theory. lol, are you trying to be funny? anecdotal evidence are an accepted, if not always reliable, form of evidence

Re: Australian Politics Chatter Thread i have hypotheticals to support it. say a small, new country is established. They would need capital to create the expensive infrastructure to support the population. This infrastructure is highly expensive per person, but as the population increases...

i think McCain is the most deserving of the two. However, that does not mean he will be a good president, and that's the most important. I'm quite undecided.

Re: Australian Politics Chatter Thread uh, lol, i think i misread your post. my bad :uhoh:

Re: Australian Politics Chatter Thread i don't know if you agree with me on this, but how i think of it is that every country must have a minimal amount of emission, a threshold amount. The more population a country has, the less significant the threshold amount seems. It's kind of like an...

Re: Australian Politics Chatter Thread i'm not catholic and i don't want to be purged :rofl:

Re: Australian Politics Chatter Thread this is rather petty and absurd, but, somehow Rudd seems very smug. the way he talks in a slow way, and how how he takes time to think about everything, makes him seem like a sly bastard. i think its just me though :confused:

Re: Australian Politics Chatter Thread however, each country has different policies so it must also be taken into account.

Re: Australian Politics Chatter Thread a per capita basis competely disadvantages Australia. So until every country cuts their emissions equally, and proportionately (how they do this i don't know, but a system can be worked out), i see no reason for Australia to cut theirs while the biggest...

Re: Australian Politics Chatter Thread +1, but i think its 2% per capita means jack all. china has a low per capita emission. but it's the largest emitter in the WORLD. if china were to place restrictions on its emissions on a per capita basis it would be completely insignificant, as it...

Re: Australian Politics Chatter Thread he's playing the 'blame game' that he hypocritically branded howard of playing when he was in opposition.

i think what ari89 is implying is that the fact that the casualties may be under-reported is irrelevant. The fact that casualties are under-reported has got nothing to do with how mythical chaos has got the wrong statistics

i'm really surprised you two have that on your shelves, and you're guys...and you admit to it. i've read it, and dare i say i quite liked it, but i've always been quite hesitant to admit it, seeing as its fanbase seems to be almost unanimously of the female sex. kudos to you guys ^^ i don't...