Search results

I'd be interested too, but I've pmed so reply!

it is indeed a cruel question, I rekon the examiner was trying to be arrogant by giving his exam an "unanswerable" question. Could you post up the solns please...

What year do u guyz rekon had the toughest question...

I agree with you all, but the fact of the matter is, like all subjects in the HSC nowdays, there is a huge stress on comprehension-type answers [look at chemistry, physics and the latin comment...] With the current format, I can only see the comment getting larger. And I third the comment that...

as someone outlined before, it doesnt mean anything what mark u get so long as ur the top rank because it is your school's top HSC mark that will give you, if you are the top rank, your course mark... this having been said [ablative absolute:)], i'd be worried with a really really low mark cauz...

pals wtf you going on about... you arrogance astounds me... anyways for raw marks about 90 over for band 6 methinks...

ease up he's just interested in wat people think. pure for me i hate statistics...and applied is sometimes so tedious...

lol i agree with you all... I have lee, patel, cambridge and coroneous in my stock and from what i have done i would say that lee is v good for complex numbers and polys (some hard ones) but overall id have 2 say that cambridge for good questions and variety is best for 4 unit (patel has nice...

hey did billy write those 2 papers cauz they were pretty soft dun u rekon?

in ex 2, in answering the original question, there is certainly benefit in fa for questions 1-7; but q8, especially the end part, requires na...