Recognition of the role of the unions and protection of rights to office space and access to internal systems and services.
Is that rights to resources for the union? If so, I'd definitely disagree with that.
Equality of access to 17% superannuation for all staff.
I'm quite neutral on this one because I'm not sure on how superannuation works and all that.
If it's under the contract you sign, I don't think there should be a need for change there.
New permanent positions for long-term casual and fixed-term academics. and Any new positions should only be fixed term in case a person “isn’t any good”.
As far as I know, casual workers would get 25% casual loading - this makes the only issue job security. Personally, I agree with the view of the management more than the NTEU view because I would expect a new academic to be doing a half-decent job assuming they are at least given the chance to adjust. The management's key word is "new" - to me, that's not a problem if it's just "new" academics.
Protection of personal (sick) leave entitlements. and The current personal (sick) leave entitlement is excessive compared to community standards and embarrassing for senior management outside the University.
Again, I am more inclined to agree with the view of the management on this one - even though it isn't being abused (apparently), doesn't mean that there shouldn't be change. Obviously, the management doesn't want academics abusing their rights to have lots of sick leave.
Also, there are 55 staff that have taken 50 days - how can you be sure that none of them were abusing it? Was each of the 55 staff individually investigated? What about the ~11% that took between 10 and 50 days?
With that said, I don't disagree with ALL of the clauses but I definitely don't agree with a lot of them.